Aborted Fetal Cells

Many modern day live virus vaccines are grown in cell lines developed from organs of aborted babies and thus is the center for great controversy. This is established fact, clearly labeled by vaccine manufacturers in their inserts and appears on the CDC website. We have attached a chart of the currently used ones according to their lab connotations. Those connotations stand for the following individuals:

☀WI-38
Developed in 1964, taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female baby. WI = Wistar Institute, 38 = 38th baby. Is the Growth medium for the Rubella virus- RA273.

☀RA273 
Taken from the lung of a 3 month gestation aborted baby. R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th baby, 3=3rd tissue explant. (Then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line to get the MMR viruses. Stanley Plotkin, vaccine developer, would later reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them. A total of over 80 separate abortions were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine- 21 abortions from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.)

☀MRC-5: Developed in 1970 from the lung tissue of a 14 week gestation male baby. Introduced in Great Britain by the Medical Research Council. 

☀HEK-293: Developed in 1973 from aborted baby kidney cells genetically engineered combined with adenovirus. 293 is the number of the experiment.

☀Per C6
Developed in 2001 from an isolated retina of a baby about 18 weeks gestation. This cell line was made to be ‘immortal’ but failed. It caused cancerous tumors in mice. Was used in the HIV vaccine trial but caused cancer so it was pulled. Crucell-advent of their PER C6 fetal cell line took off. PER C6 is a normal cell that has been modified to resist cell senescence. In doing so, it introduces the potential for cancer to form in the vaccine recipient.

☀WI-26 VA4
An SV40 transformed derivative of WI-26, a human diploid cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue of a male Caucasian. The cells have SV40 T-Ag but infectious virus has not been rescued. 

☀WALVAX2
Recently developed from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation baby girl. To replace the current MERC-5 and WI-38 which are depleting. 

To obtain all these, the scientists had to be present at the time of the abortion because “In order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion”-Dr. C. Ward Kischer. 

And it’s still happening today. Notice again the last listed: WALVAX2. This is a brand new line in which 9 babies died in the making:
http://www.lifenews.com/2015/09/09/scientists-in-china-create-new-vaccines-using-body-parts-from-nine-aborted-babies/

And it will admittedly continue. PBS recently reports on how fetal tissue is VITAL to vaccine and drug development:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential/

There are 271 vaccines (and 85 drugs) in the pipeline awaiting approvals that we cannot see the ingredients too yet but you can bet they include fetal lines just like our current ones do:
http://phrma.org/medicines-in-development-for-vaccines-2013
http://soundchoice.org/aborted-fetal-products/

Why does this matter? Two reasons.

#1: A considerable portion of America is Pro-Life and may object to such a practice if they were made aware of it. Let’s be aware and spread that awareness. Certainly it’s an understandable reason that people of faith may opt to abstain from such products and why the religious exemption is so important.

#2: Though it is established scientific fact that loose, living DNA can insert itself into the genome of any host, the introduction of aborted fetal DNA via injections (along with adjuvants designed to stimulate the immune response to the proteins and chemicals with side effects of opening the blood brain barrier) has never been studied by vaccine manufacturers nor the FDA. Many scientists now hypothesize that some childhood cancers and neurological disorders can be traced to such genetic interference: http://soundchoice.org/research/